Well what is it? Spits or nofollows? do follow and link building myths.

I hear so much about the do follow no follow attribute that I felt it necessary to weigh in on the subject.  While I respect the logic behind this and in no way endorse mass linking to

change the relevance of a page, I have a different opinion.  When does a link begin to have value? When traffic passes through it I say.  And now comes the truckload of “ifs”.

If the traffic source is x.

If the traffic volume is x.

If the the ratio of volume’s quality is x.

If  origin point quality score > x

Origin, Volume, Destination.

So could it be that a link that has thousands of visitors meeting the criteria traveling  through a link could render its “no follow” attribute useless?

Remember, Great SEO is aligning with Google to bring accuracy to organic search.  When you build a document just for relevancy you cheat your self and your client. Great SEO is an orgasm you can’t fake.  You can scream and moan and practice  “keyword feng shui” all you want,  and even put them in your wordtracker basket as you count the clicks you will never get by including the whole keyword universe.  A much better approach is a practical  “custom defined nomenclature” that aligns with Google to improve search for everyone.

If you are working to make Google a great resource, They will reward you will rankings.